Skip to content

Conversation

@pan3793
Copy link
Member

@pan3793 pan3793 commented Dec 9, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade jersey to 3.0.18 .

This is a backport of the following.

Why are the changes needed?

To bring the latest bug fixes.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the BUILD label Dec 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@LuciferYang LuciferYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM (pending tests)

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

dongjoon-hyun commented Dec 9, 2025

FYI, @pan3793 ,

  • I intentionally didn't mention those info in my PR and hope to verify this commit in Apache Spark 4.1.0 release.
  • So, when you do the backport the existing commit, please respect the existing PR description like you do the cherry-pick.
    • For this PR, I revised for you by copying the existing one to here.

To @LuciferYang and @peter-toth , I intentionally didn't backport this PR to the old branches initially because I'd like to hold this until we make Apache Spark 4.1.0 successfully. We can merge this after we finish to verify via Apache Spark 4.1.0 release.

If you look at the branch-4.1, you will know that there exist several additional patches which I didn't backport in the same reasons.

@pan3793
Copy link
Member Author

pan3793 commented Dec 17, 2025

@dongjoon-hyun, this is actually a combination of SPARK-53223 and SPARK-51543 from the backport perspective, should I add both of their original descriptions?

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

dongjoon-hyun commented Dec 18, 2025

@dongjoon-hyun, this is actually a combination of SPARK-53223 and SPARK-51543 from the backport perspective, should I add both of their original descriptions?

Hi, @pan3793 . Thank you for double-checking.

However, we don't consider in that accumulated way. This is a simple and obvious backport of Jersey 3.0.18 dependency change (one-liner) with regenerated result of dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-3-hive-2.3 on branch-4.0.

If there is any other code change, it might be consider as you mentioned. There is no other code contribution from SPARK-51543, isn't it?

@pan3793
Copy link
Member Author

pan3793 commented Dec 18, 2025

SPARK-51543: (master) upgrade Jersey from 3.0.16 => 3.0.17
SPARK-52223: (master) upgrade Jersey from 3.0.17 => 3.0.18
this one: (branch-4.0) upgrade Jersey 3.0.16 => 3.0.18


then the current state is good enough, it's ready to go.

However, we don't consider in that accumulated way.

LuciferYang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to upgrade `jersey` to 3.0.18 .

This is a backport of the following.
- #51949

### Why are the changes needed?

To bring the latest bug fixes.

- eclipse-ee4j/jersey@3.0.17...3.0.18
  - eclipse-ee4j/jersey#5891 (Support Java 25)
  - eclipse-ee4j/jersey#5822
- https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jersey/releases/3.0.18

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass the CIs.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes #53403 from pan3793/SPARK-54648.

Authored-by: Cheng Pan <chengpan@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor

Merged into branch-4.0. Thanks @pan3793 @dongjoon-hyun and @peter-toth

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants